Robert
E. Lee never achieved his personal legend. In terms consistent with the
metaphors in Paulo Coehlo’s fable The
Alchemist, Lee chose to stay with his sheep instead, out of a sense of duty.
In the
same war Lee met General Scott, who plays the part of the King of Salem, aiding
Lee in developing his career and doing his best to convince him to take the
right path to his legend. As states and officers were choosing sides for the
Civil War, Scott did his best to convince Lee it would be in his best interest
to stay with the Union. There was no way
the Confederates could have won the war, and Lee had to see it was hopeless. Anyone
who managed to stay awake long enough in history classes knows the Confederates
had a long list severe, sometimes crippling disadvantages, including population
deficiency, a level of industrialization below what was needed to keep up with
the North’s war factories, and dependency on foreign trade that their meager naval
strength could not protect against the warships of the Union. The Confederates
lacked the resources for more than one offensive while the Union, under Ulysses
Grant, was able to do nothing but. Grant was not the first choice for the top Union
commander. Lee had been approached before
the war officially began, at President Lincoln’s insistence (Long 92), but refused to abandon his home state of
Virginia, his sheep. In Coelho’s metaphor sheep are whatever a person feels
responsible for, and feels they cannot drop for the sake of pursuing their
personal legend. The choice would cost Lee his home, which would become
Arlington National Cemetery, and his military career.
He may
have lost a shot at the presidency. Lee was a popular, natural leader before the war. Otherwise he would
not still be in our school textbooks. Had he stayed with the Union he would
have become a war hero, and war heroes are very often elected to presidency. Eisenhower
and Washington did it. Ulysses Grant managed it, despite past problems with
alcohol and a rather less illustrious military record (O’Brian). Lee likely would
have been better for the country. Grant accomplished little his first term and
his second was plagued by economic troubles and administration scandals (O’Brian).
The South would also have taken more kindly to Lee governing the United States,
as he was one of them, easing the process of Reconstruction. Fear for his home
state kept Lee from his personal legend.
·
Virginia=sheep
· General Scott=King of Salem, tried to keep him on track
· General Scott=King of Salem, tried to keep him on track
Works Cited
Manchester, William. American Caesar. Boston: Little, Brown
and Company, 1978. Print.
This book is actually an extensive
biography of Douglas Macarthur, but frequently compares its subject to Lee and
in some places was more detailed than Lee’s own biography.
Long, A.L. Memoirs of Robert E. Lee. Secaucus, NJ: The Blue
and Gray Press, 1983. Print.
For some reason, when I picked up
this book I expected it have been written by Lee himself. The lack of author
name on the front cover adds to this illusion. However, it is revealed in the
preface this was actually written by a close friend of Lee, as Lee had decided
only later in life to write a memoir and died before he could begin. Long can
write nothing bad about Lee and admits in the preface he had great personal
respect for the general. Subsequent lack of detail is slightly suspicious.
O’Brian, Steven G. “Ulysses S. Grant.” ABC-Clio. Web. 19 May
2014.
Self-explanatory.
No comments:
Post a Comment